Tom & Viv | | Cast : | Willem Dafoe, Miranda Richardson | | Director : | Brian Gilbert | | Studio : | Buena Vista Home Vid | | Format : | Color, Closed-captioned, Widescreen, DTS Surround Sound | | Released Date : | December 02, 1994 | | DVD Released Date : | May 03, 2005 | | Language : | English (Dubbed) | | Audience Rating : | PG-13 (Parental Guidance Suggested) | | | BUY THIS DVD FROM AMAZON | Customer Reviews
| Rating |     | | Date | January 07, 2005 | | Summary | Plain and Simple | Content
 | It's plain and simple that TS Eliot was a monster!! Viv was a highly intelligent, creative and very misunderstood woman. Good Grief, she was married to a stick who had no business marry a woman with all her livliness. Today, Viv would be the life of the party, and Tom, Tom who!! She had no where to go with all her creativity and that would make anyone mad. She was suffering from hormonal imbalance, not insanity. Poor Viv. There was no one who understood what she was going through. And those ridiculous doctors! Idiots!! And then with HER money, he has her commited. A perfectly sane woman commited and just freaking leaves her there!!! But the part in the movie that I loved, was when her mother let him have it. If I were Viv's mother, I probably would have said it the same calm and classy way she did and then I would've of added by screaming "Now give me back every penny of Viv's money, you ratbastard!!!
I came away feeling that Tom realized what a terrible mistake he had made but it did'nt make me feel any better. Makes you think twice about these "so-called geniuses!! |
| Rating |     | | Date | September 26, 2004 | | Summary | Almost ... | Content
 | Willem Dafoe and Miranda Richardson (who was nominated for Best Actress, 1994) are the saving grace of this movie. While is isn't bad, it isn't runaway great, either. And it takes a lot for me to admit that.
The movie is kind of uneven and ... it seems the director didn't know what direction to head in, or maybe they messed up a little in the editing room, but ... I mean that one scene where Viv is about to die of influenza, and then two seconds later she's fine and 15 years have gone by? What was that about?
But ... this movie is just another example of how women's health and women's issues were looked over not so long ago. It's always very easy to blame it on the menstrual cycle or just say she's plain crazy. viv got a raw deal.
The scene with the knife and taxicab is hilarious! I love Miranda! |
| Rating |     | | Date | June 24, 2004 | | Summary | "I can make you happy my darling" | Content
 | Thomas Stearns Eliot was born in Missouri on September 26, 1888. He lived in St. Louis during the first eighteen years of his life and attended Harvard University. In 1910, he left the United States for the Sorbonne, having earned both undergraduate and masters degrees. After a year in Paris, he returned to Harvard to pursue a doctorate in philosophy, but returned to Europe and settled in England in 1914. The following year, he married Vivienne Haigh-Wood and began working in London, first as a teacher, and later for Lloyd's Bank. Variously diagnosed with "moral insanity," anorexia and hysteria, Vivienne Haigh-Wood suffered from severe menstrual symptoms most of her life, as well as an inherited tendency for manic depression. Having collided in their desperation to escape their mothers, she and Tom married in 1915, to their families' disapproval and to Tom's quickly encroaching disgust. By the time Vivienne was committed to an asylum in 1938, five years after T. S. Eliot deserted her, she was a lonely, occasionally demented figure. Shunned by literary London, she was the neurotic wife whom Eliot had left behind. Tom and Viv, a gorgeously produced, but terribly sad movie, begins after Tom and Vivienne have met and focuses on their troubled the marriage. The opening scenes show Vivienne fraught with headaches, sudden violent mood swings, irregular periods and showing her finding a type of solace and security in her relationship with Tom. Told from the point of view of both Tom and Vivienne, the movie is judiciously divided into four parts: 1915 - when Tom and Viv are courting, and when Vivienne shows signs of mental illness: 1919, straight after the war, when Tom is beginning to achieve notoriety as a poet; 1932, when Vivienne's illness is beginning to cause public embarrassment to her family, and 1944, after she has been finally committed to the Northumberland House sanitarium. At first, her family is extremely hesitant to allow the marriage between Tom and Vivienne to take place. Her brother Maurice - stylishly played by Tim Dutton - neglects to tell Tom about her "troubles," and Vivienne's father accuses Tom of being after the family money. Tom, at the time, is a struggling poet, living in an attic in the City with Bertrand Russell who is considered "the most hated man in all of London." Tom feels that poetry is a "mugs game" but he tries to appeal to the good judgment of Vivienne's mother - played with remarkable grace by Rosemary Harris - to let him into the family. Vivienne desperately wants to make Tom happy, and it is to Miranda Richardson's credit that the viewer really gets a sense of Vivienne's quiet desperation. Vivienne is also very supportive of Tom - she reads for him and assists in getting his poetry published; he relies on her completely - she's his "first audience." Willem Defoe brings a quiet and understated elegance to the role, and he expertly conveys Elliot's obvious love for Vivienne, while at the same time expressing a silent frustration over their relationship. As Vivienne steadily spins out of control, becoming more emotionally erratic, Tom realizes that he's married to a woman "that he loves, but everything that he does with her falls apart." Although he eventually contributed to Vivienne's institutionalization, she remains an honest person, who sticks by Tom, and his beliefs and she spiritually never really leaves him. With a fine sense of period detail, the film gracefully and elegantly portrays life during the Edwardian era - the stuffy but gorgeous drawing rooms, the hats, the frocks and the newly invented motorcars. Tom and Viv is a fine-looking period piece that is emotionally quite heart wrenching, and the movie contains some of the best performances from some of the finest actors in the business. Mike Leonard June 04. |
| Rating |  | | Date | July 16, 2003 | | Summary | Sliced Version | Content
 | Careful: This DVD release of TOM AND VIV cuts my favorite scene contained in the original VHS edition--the one in which Viv dresses in disguise and goes to a public reading and book signing given by Tom, who graciously signs her book and pretends not to know her. If anyone else noticed this and has an explanation, please post! |
| Rating |      | | Date | May 05, 2002 | | Summary | if in doubt, blame a woman's menstrual cycle | Content
 | The first time I viewed this film (about 3 or 4 years ago), I too was confused about plot details, particularly what exactly was mentally and/or physically wrong with Vivian. But even in my ignorance/innocence, I didn't find it necessary to angrily ridicule her as the crazed hag who threatened to ruin the great T.S. Eliot's literary career (and I never felt that way about Zelda Fitzgerald either--call me humane--despite what my learned English professors said to the contrary--"Oh, poor Scott and Tom, having to deal with 'women's issues'). The focus of Tom and Viv is on Viv, not Tom, because, as the film explains in the beginning, Vivian's brother, Morris, felt guilty about abandoning his sister to a mental hospital. If you watch this film to reaffirm your illusions of how great literary production was once again stifled by a woman, you would do better to check the library for critical books on Eliot circa 1950-90. I may be looking through non-rose-colored glasses, but this film does not intend to redeem Eliot (although it does not completely villify him either), so it should not be gawked at for its failure to do so. Why is it so hard for us to admit our "great literary gods"--Shakespeare, Dickens, Frost, Fitzgerald, and, yes, TS Eliot too--were really monsters? It is important to understand that the late Victorian conception of mental illness as most often applied to women was directly linked to very sketchy and incorrect knowledge of her reproductive organs. In short, a woman was more prone to hysteria than a man simply because she had a uterus. Hysteria/uterus. Look it up. And when watching the film, pay close attention to the doctor's description of "moral insanity" and the ludicrous questions the doctors ask Vivian in order to assess her sanity. If that doesn't gain your sympathy for Viv over Tom, then watch the manner in which Viv is informed of the news that she is in fact "morally insane." Most disturbing to this viewer is not the news that as Lyndall Gordon's recently revised biography of Eliot points out, he was an imperfect man (to say the least). Most disturbing are the reviews of this film that continue to blame Vivian Eliot, after watching a film designed to help us understand the complexities of this couple's relationship, not to mention the old cliche--"it takes two to tango!" Oh yes, I too love The Great Gatsby, The Waste Land, but there's no denying that Prufrock's got some serious sexual hang-ups when it comes to women. Why is that still so horrifying? |
|