The Sailor Who Fell from Grace with the Sea | | Cast : | Sarah Miles, Kris Kristofferson | | Director : | Lewis John Carlino | | Studio : | Image Entertainment | | Format : | Color, Widescreen | | Released Date : | January 01, 1976 | | DVD Released Date : | January 27, 2004 | | Language : | English (Dubbed), English (Original Language) | | Audience Rating : | R (Restricted) | | | BUY THIS DVD FROM AMAZON |
Customer Reviews
| Rating |  | | Date | August 05, 2005 | | Summary | This is an excellent DVD rendering of the original film.... | Content
 | I won't talk about the in's-and-outs of the story line and the social impact of the film. I'll just say that this DVD version being sold here on Amazon is an outstanding rendering of the original film. This DVD version is sharp and well-made and I didn't notice any parts of the movie that were cut. I'd recommend buying this DVD if you're looking for a great copy of the film. |
| Rating | | | Date | July 18, 2004 | | Summary | Beware! This Is a Ripoff! | Content
| I was in San Diego several years back and happened into a downtown video store. I was pleased to find a VHS copy of "Sailor" and couldn't wait to get home so I could watch Kris and Sarah make hot sexy love all over the place. But what I got instead was a G-rated movie suitable for the kids, Grandma, Fido, etc. All the Good Parts of this movie have been deleted...without any sort of "altered version" designation on the package! Honestly, I wasn't aware that movies were sanitized for home-video release; I thought it was the other way around (i.e. really racy, scandalous stuff unsuitable for theatrical viewing was included on the video). So, what is the name of the genius who deleted this footage, and when will a *complete* version be available? |
| Rating | | | Date | February 24, 2004 | | Summary | This is cut! | Content
| All the scenes containing adult material are edited and cut.I reccomend you to protest this and wait for an uncensoured version. |
| Rating | | | Date | August 28, 2003 | | Summary | I have to see it again! | Content
| This film was great it stuck in my head for years, I seen it on playboy magazine in 1977 and WOW!I could not believe the sex . It blew me away I neve seen anything like it ever. Then two years later I saw it in a second run theater the film story was something different at the time I was about 17 and I never seen a film like this before. So all these years I have been looking for this film.And now I could go back to that place in the darken theater an watch sarah & kris do what I rememberd the most about this film and the boy who played the son.I'll enjoy keeping this vhs but I hope it will be on dvd. It's a great film to thoughs who have seen it know what I am talking about I got my copy. |
| Rating | | | Date | July 03, 2002 | | Summary | Has some merits but the book is certainly better | Content
| This movie takes the liberty of transplanting the Yukio Mishima novel's setting from Yokohama, Japan to a sleepy English port town. Inevitably, it changes the nationalities of the protagonists (Japanese widow and sailor to English and American, respectively). These modifications are not what detracts from the movie's impact, but instead the plotline and the character development (or rather, the lack of).
Regarding plot, the filmmakers took an oversimplified approach on Mishima's rich examination into the characters' psyches. This successively leads to the poor character development in the film. The actors sincerely try to display intensity in their characters' roles, but without any understanding of their derivations, they muddle the story. A good example involves the "chief" of the boys' gang. We are given an expose his controlling, fascist behavior: one memorable scene involves him angrily kicking out all the members of the gang from his house due to them not grasping his level of consciousness (the twisted, hateful look on this young boy's face shows his ferocity). But without further details on his motives or personality, it's difficult to surmise his attitude. We only see that he is an angry, manipulative, nihilistic monster.
The love affair between the sailor and the mother of one of the gangmembers actully compounds the film's problems. Although their sex scenes are erotic and very explicit (they were considered quite shocking for that time; today they might qualify as soft-core pornography, albeit many will disagree with this), one is left to wonder what attracts these two who have such disparity between them? The director places great emphasis on this physical attraction and spends much time detailing this. Again, a lot of effort being placed into one facet of these people without knowing the fundamentals of them.
This film does have its positive qualities: the English setting is wonderfully photographed and the filmmakers show an earnest effort in conveying Mishima's story onto film. |
|
