Eye of the Needle | | Cast : | Donald Sutherland, Kate Nelligan | | Director : | Richard Marquand | | Studio : | Mgm/Ua Studios | | Format : | Color, Widescreen | | Released Date : | July 24, 1981 | | DVD Released Date : | July 30, 2002 | | Language : | English (Dubbed), French (Dubbed), French (Subtitled), English (Subtitled), English (Original Language), French (Original Language) | | Audience Rating : | R (Restricted) | | | BUY THIS DVD FROM AMAZON |
Customer Reviews
| Rating |  | | Date | June 09, 2005 | | Summary | Why should we care about these characters? | Content
 | I think Eye of the Needle, at least as the film tells the story, suffers from a common problem I have seen in a lot of "action thrillers": poor character development. Why should we care about these characters one way or the other? Instead we have a modicum of action and violence, a dose of beautiful ocean scenery, and lovemaking. There was not much complexity or discernment in any of the characters. Donald Sutherland simply looks depressed, as a serious actor might be if he found himself wasting his time making a bad film.
Alfred Hitchcock did a much better film along the same lines with "The 39 Steps". |
| Rating | | | Date | May 28, 2005 | | Summary | Still Holds Up | Content
| Early 80's cloak and dagger WW2 spy movie is probably not seen much anymore by anyone who isn't a WW2 films or Donald Sutherland fan. Set in WW2, Eye of the Needle can easily be seen as a Cold war parable. Instead of a Nazi spy w/ the scoop on Normandy, make him a Commie Spy with some equally vital Cold War info. Enemies are among us. Can't trust anyone. Must be stopped before he leaves the country..etc. Suspenseful, atmospheric, and well acted. If you like the movie, the book is even better. |
| Rating | | | Date | February 07, 2005 | | Summary | The encounter of two different natures! | Content
|
Consider the possibilities : a super cold German Agent stranded to an unknown territory and a sexually frustrated and orphan love will meet in this state of things.
Magnificent and towering acting of Sutherland.
|
| Rating | | | Date | November 05, 2004 | | Summary | Great movie - different versions | Content
|
A great many people have already pointed out why Eye of the Needle is such a fantantic thriller. I wholeheartedly agree and will therefore not repeat what has alreadly been stated before. I only would like to add that there exist two versions of this film - or more precisley to different endings of the same film. I don't know about USA, but the version shown on television in Europe has Ian Bannion tranported to the remote island by helicopter. The current DVD-version does not feature the aforementioned helicopter sequence. My question for Amazon and MGM is, would it be possible to include the alternate ending in a future DVD-edition of this first class nail biter?
Kind, Chris |
| Rating | | | Date | November 02, 2004 | | Summary | The war has come down to the two of us. | Content
| So, at first I had trouble deciding if this film was great or just another war film that would be forgotten about as the years progressed. It was a tough decision that required a day of thought. There were definitely scenes in this film that would embarrass even the most novice movie goer, yet there is something about the story and the humanistic approach to a non-human element that seeps from this film's pores. The scene that stands out the most in my mind is when Sutherland is running to the rain to catch Lucy. You can obviously tell that he is on a sound stage and water is being thrown in his face. His acting and the way that that particular scene was set up was appalling. It made me laugh instead of feel any sort of suspense or fear. It forced credibility for Sutherland's character right out the door. There were several other scenes that just didn't seem to fit in this film that made you question the theatrical release of this film or if it was a straight-to-television production. If you can get through these few lapses in the director's train of thought, then you will be able to see the powerful story that lies within.
When I first saw the box to this film I didn't know what to expect. To my utter enjoyment, Eye of the Needle is one of those gems hiding in a mud puddle. After you wipe it off (look away from the DVD cover), you will begin to see the beauty of this film. As we begin our story, we see Sutherland as a normal person, but as the film advances, our idea and interpretation of his character blows our mind. When most war films simply believe in keeping you in your theater seats by showing graphic images of battle and chaos, this film goes in the completely other direction. This is a story between two people and the small battle that they fight for their beliefs. I mentioned earlier that I felt this was a very humanistic film. The reason for that statement is because we witness the human element to war. Billy is the perfect example of a man who has lost a portion of his life, yet is too depressed to see the happiness in front of him. Normally in war films this comes late story, but in Eye of the Needle it is shown right up front. Next, we hardly ever are given a very human side to the villain in these stories. Normally, they kill without remorse, but again, not in this film. What we witness are two humans caught between a hard place with nobody else to turn to.
While war is being raged overseas with thousands of troopers, it is impressive to see stories like this that revolve around just two people. These two people can have the same effect on the war as a brigade of soldiers. I never saw their reaction to each other coming. I wasn't expecting a message in this film. I brief history lesson about the day to day activities surrounding this dark cloud of our world's history. Also, I wasn't expecting to see such powerful acting from Donald Sutherland and Kate Nelligan. Together they created more sparks on screen than most duos today. What they create is better and more realistic than most Hollywood jargon.
It is impressive to see this in a war film. I cannot stress that enough. This film surprised me and I am normally not a huge war fan. I think the reason that it stood out was because director Richard Marquand develops two amazing characters and places them in a war torn country, only to uproot them again into a place of beauty and nature. We go from one spectrum to the next with Marquand and it works. Ken Follett, who wrote the novel that this film is based, has done a great job of taking a world that is huge and bringing it down to just these two characters. It is not often that you see that in a war film, especially one made in 1981.
Overall, I flip-flopped my decision all around until I finally made a choice. This film was amazing. I can look past the low-budgeted scenes that make this film dated in the 80s, and see the amazing truth behind the characters and story. This is one of the most impressive stories that I have seen come from Hollywood. I could literally watch this film again and probably catch more that I missed the first time. This isn't your average spy film; this is instead a film about humans and the comfort we need in our lives. Also, I must end with this note, if any villain (without saying who) can use his trademark kill six times in forty minutes, you should realize that this film is going to be a great ride.
Grade: **** out of ***** |
|
